Honestly, this isn't even a feature request at this point it's a gap that should have been filled a long time ago. The whole reason people use the mobile app is to handle things on the go, so being able to attach an expense to a customer but not mark it as billable completely defeats the purpose. You're essentially doing the same job twice once on your phone and then again on desktop just to tick a billable box.
The photo capture feature is genuinely great and saves a ton of time by eliminating the scanning step, which makes it even more frustrating that something as simple as a billable checkbox is still missing. It's like putting together a beautiful https://msdcontractors.com. you can have everything perfectly designed, the right materials, the right layout, but if one small functional piece is missing, the whole setup feels incomplete no matter how good the rest of it looks.
Multiple users across iOS and Android have been asking for this for a while now, and the fix really isn't complicated a simple checkbox on the expense creation form is all it takes. No extra app downloads, no double work, no missed billable expenses. QuickBooks Mobile is genuinely a solid platform and clearly a lot of care goes into it, but this one small oversight is costing users real money and real time. Hope the team prioritizes this soon.

Billable expense functionality in an Android mobile app allows businesses to track, categorize, and assign expenses directly to clients, ensuring accurate billing and streamlined accounting. This simplifies financial management and saves valuable time. In a similar way, massages in Margate provide a holistic massages Margate https://holistictherapy4you.com/ streamlined path to wellness by targeting stress points, easing muscle pain, and improving circulation. Both solutions focus on efficiency and care whether it’s financial accuracy or physical well-being helping individuals or businesses feel more balanced, supported, and ready to perform at their best in everyday life.

Agree with all 4 previous comments.

This is expecially true because you can take a picture of the expense item, eliminating the step of scanning a document and then uploading it to qbonline.

I am surprised this has not been done as well. We would really love this feature for our company so another app does not have to be downloaded!!

Me too - it seems madness you can assign it to a customer but not mark it as billable in the app which is surely the whole point of putting expenses in on the road on an app! really really hope this gets fixed soon!

I'm a little surprised that this still hasn't been done. Seems like a basic function and without it, tracking my expenses while travelling is double the work.

I too love the IOS app on my Ipad, but can't believe that you can't mark the expense as billable..please help us QB's...we love what you do..and I know it all cost money...but we need this out here. Thanks!

This is the most incredibly stupid oversight I have ever encountered in commercially produced software. This isn't even a "feature" request. This is simple *duh*. The other anonymous commenter is right. This would take a dev guy no more than a few hours, and that's on a Monday morning with a five alarm hangover. Seriously, this is unacceptable. I have to go through all my expenses twice to make sure I don't miss something, and then the damned thing freezes up. It's taken me 20 minutes to check about 30 items. Wow. Total waste of time.

There should be a way to indicate an expense is billable when entering an expense on the app. As it now is, I enter it on the app, and then have to go expense by expense on the computer to check the billable box. That seems like an easy fix and very important from a time-saving perspective.

Couldn't agree more. This is a hugely frustrating omission from the QBO app and actually creates more work due to the need to run a report of expenses marked billable for each client (which in itself is so much harder than it should be) and then manually mark each one billable (no batch function here either).

I work in software and I know from first hand experience on a similar function for one of my customers that this is such a simple addition that will take one of the dev guys no more than a couple of hours to implement and test and it would take a massive pain in the ass manual process out of what should be a quick and simple job.